The addresee of the law, Flavius Caesarius, was magister officiorum, then the pretorian prefect of the East in the years 395-97, consul in 397 and then again the pretorian prefect of the East in 400-403 (PLRE I, Caesarius 6; Delmaire 2005: 184). It is then impossible that the law was addressed to him in 398. Delmaire (2005: 184-85) suggested that the law should be addressed to Eutychianus (just as 9.40.16 [2104]) and that the address to Caesarius was the mistake of the Code's redactor.