Presbyters Uniwersytet Warszawski
ID
ER 792
Canon 5 of the council in Mérida in AD 666 orders that bishops can send as their representative only an archpresbyter or presbyter, and not a deacon to a council.
Canon 5
 
Ut episcopus ad suam personam ad concilium non diaconem sed archipresbyterum aut presbyterum dirigat.
 
Iuxta cannonicum ordinem tempore quo concilium per metropolitani volumtatem et regiam iussionem electum fuerit agere, omnes confinitimos episcopos in unum oportet adesse, nec pro tali re quaelibet causa opponi debetur ad excusationem. Quod si contigerit aliquem de fratribus retineri ab infirmitate qualiter non possit venire aut per regiam iussionem iniunctum acceperit aliquid agere ut sit cause per quod non possit concilio interesse, quicquid tale acciderit, metropolitano suo fideliter intimet cuncta per suam epistolam manu sua subscriptam, ut in postmodum quaeratur ne excusationem faciat aliquam. Ad suam tamen personam non aliter nisi aut archipresbyterum suum dirigebit aut si archipresbytero impossibilitas fuerit presbyterem utilem, cuius dignitas cum prudentia pateat, a tergo episcoporum inter presbyteres sedere et quaeque in consilio fuerit, acta scire et subscribere. Iniustum enim hoc accipti coetus noster, ut quisquam episcoporum diaconum ad suam personam dirigat; hic enim, quia presbyteris iunior esse videtur, sedendi cum episcopis in concilio nulla ratione permittitur. Quemcumque ergo ex presbyteris dirigere elegerit, instructum per informationem dirigat, ut ratio poscit, atque cum eo mandatarium suum iuxta legis ordinem munitum, ut si a quolibet contra eundem episcopum in concilio fuerit suggestum, ab eo quem direxit qui petit accipiat responsum, et iustitia quae fuerit ordinata nullam in postmodum dilationem habeat.
 
(ed. Vives 1963: 328-329)
Canon 5
 
That a bishop shall send to a council on his behalf not a deacon, but an archpresbyter or presbyter.
 
According to the canonical order, at the time indicated for a council by the will of the metropolitan bishop and by royal order, all the bishops from the province shall gather together, and they shall not excuse themselves for whatever reason. But if it happens that one of the brothers is so ill that he cannot come or he has already been obliged by royal order to do something that does not allow him to participate in the council, in such case he shall fully explain all this in a letter signed with his own hand to the metropolitan bishop so that from now no one will seek whatever excuse. On his behalf he will send only an archpresbyter, or if it is impossible, an able presbyter whose dignity and prudence are evident, to sit among presbyters behind the back of the bishops. Whatever will be decreed by the council, he shall read and sign. Our gathering considers it unjust to send a deacon on behalf of the bishop. A deacon is junior to the presbyters, so, by no means shall he be permitted to sit with the bishops at the council. Whomever among the presbyters he chooses, he shall send him properly informed, instructed, and equipped with a letter of recommendation according to the legal order, so that if anything is brought up against the [absent] bishop by anyone at the council, he who has been sent will be able to answer to the person that has addressed him, and so that from now the just decrees of the council will no longer enter into force with delay.
 
(trans. M. Szada)

Place of event:

Region
  • Iberian Peninsula
City
  • Merida

About the source:

Title: Council of Merida in 666, Concilium Emeritense a. 666, Council of Mérida in 666
Origin: Merida (Iberian Peninsula)
Denomination: Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian
The provincial council of Lusitania was held in Mérida in the church of Jerusalem in November 666. It was presided over by Bishop Proficius of Mérida, and eleven other bishops were present.
Edition:
J. Vives ed., Concilios visigóticos e hispano-romanos, Barcelona-Madrid 1963.

Categories:

Travel and change of residence
    Functions within the Church - Archpresbyter
      Described by a title - Presbyter/πρεσβύτερος
        Usurping presbyterial power
          Ecclesiastical administration - Participation in councils and ecclesiastical courts
            Ecclesiastical administration - Ecclesiastical envoy
              Public law - Ecclesiastical
                Relation with - Bishop/Monastic superior
                  Legal practice
                    Theoretical considerations - On church hierarchy
                      Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL: M. Szada, Presbyters in the Late Antique West, ER792, http://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=792