Presbyters Uniwersytet Warszawski
ID
ER 360
Canon 1 of the Council of Valence (Gaul, AD 374) forbids the ordination of men twice married or those whose wives were previously married. Those, however, who are of such condition and are already ordained will not be demoted.
[Capitulum secundum codd. coll. Fossatensis] I. De bigamis non ordinandis.
[Capitulum secundum coll. Hispanam] I. De bigamis non consecrentur.
[Capitulum secundum coll. codicis S. Amandi] I. Maritus internuptarum non ordinandus.
 
I. Sedit igitur, neminem post hanc synodum, qua eiusmodi illicitis uel sero succurritur, digamos aut internuptarum maritos ordinari clericos posse; nec requirendum utrumne initiati sacramentis diuinis, anne gentiles, hac se infelicis sortis necessitate macularint, cum diuini praecepti certa sit forma. Sed quia fratrum nostrorum uel imperitiam uel simplicitatem uel etiam praesumptionem damnare non possumus, nec per omnes ecclesias quae sunt iam pridem male gesta corrigere, placuit etiam de eorum statu qui prius ordinati sunt nihil reuolui, si nulli extrinsecus causa procedat qua indigni ministerio comprobentur.
 
(ed. Munier 1963: 38-39, 43)
[Title according to the codices of the Fossatensis collection] I. On the twice married that they should not be ordained.
[Title according to the Hispana collection] I.On the twice married not to be consecrated.
[Title according to the collection of codices S. Amandi] I. Married to wives who were married earlier to someone else should not be ordained.
 
It was therefore decreed that after this synod, which indeed finds, though late, a remedy for such illicit practices, no one can be ordained a cleric who was twice married or is married to a wife who was married earlier to someone else. And it should not be distinguished whether it was after being initiated into the divine mysteries, or when they were pagans, or if they were stained because of an unfortunate fate, because the divine command is peremptory. However, because we cannot condemn either the ignorance, or naivety, or even the stubbornness of our brothers, and correct the things that were previously done wrong in all the churches, we decided not to do anything with those of such condition who were ordained prior [to this council], if there appears to be no other reason that suggests they are unworthy of their office.
 
(trans. J. Szafranowski)

Discussion:

The "unfortunate fate" mentioned in this canon is most probably the case of premature death of a cleric's wife.
 
 

Place of event:

Region
  • Gaul
City
  • Valence

About the source:

Title: Council of Valence 374, Concilium Valentinum anno 374
Origin: Valence (Gaul)
Denomination: Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian
The Council of Valence was held on 12th of July 374. According to the preface and the various lists of signatures, more or less twenty bishops attended this synod. We know nothing of other people present at this gathering. In most codices, the synodal canons are followed by the letter of the same synodal fathers addressed to the clergy of Fréjus.
Edition:
Ch. Munier ed., Concilia Galliae a. 314-a. 506, Corpus Christianorum. Series Latina 148, Turnhoult 1963.
 
Translation:
J. Gaudemet, Conciles gaulois du IVe siècle, Sources chrétiennes 241, Paris 1977

Categories:

Family life - Marriage
    Family life - Permanent relationship continued after ordination
      Family life - More than one marriage
        Described by a title - Clericus
          Impediments or requisits for the office - Marriage
            Relation with - Wife
              Relation with - Woman
                Administration of justice - Demotion
                  Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL: J. Szafranowski, Presbyters in the Late Antique West, ER360, http://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=360