Presbyters Uniwersytet Warszawski
ID
ER 2032
Ambrose, bishop of Milan (Italy) in a philosophical treatise about duties "De officiis" gives advice to clerics concerning generosity. He mentions distributing food to the hungry, providing needs for the poor, ransoming prisoners and captives, taking care of orphans, especially young women, providing for the widows, giving money to those in debt. Ambrose advices prudence, especially in the case of people who only pretend to be in serious need. Milan, the late 380s.
Book 2
 
Ambrose points out that a person who despises riches inspires admiration among men. Then he continues:
 
67. Decet igitur omnes censura frugalitatis, continentiae auctoritas, et maxime eum qui honore praestet, ne praeeminentem uirum thesauri possideant sui et pecuniis seruiat qui praeest liberis. Illud magis decet ut supra thesaurum sit animo et infra amicum obsequio; humilitas enim auget gratiam. Haec plena laudis et digna primario uiro: Non communem cum Tyriis negotiatoribus et Galaaditis mercatoribus habere turpis lucri cupidinem nec omne bonum locare in pecunia et tamquam mercenario munere cottidianos numerare quaestus, calculari compendia.
68. Quod si ab his sobrium animum gerere laudabile est, quanto illud praestantius si dilectionem multitudinis liberalitate acquiras neque superflua circa importunos neque restricta circa indigentes!
69. Plurima autem genera liberalitatis sunt: non solum cottidiano sumptu egentibus quo uitam sustinere suam possint, disponere ac dispensare alimoniam, uerum etiam his qui publice egere uerecundantur, consulere ac subuenire quatenus communis egenorum alimonia non exhauriatur. De eo enim loquor qui praeest alicui muneri - ut si officium sacerdotis gerat, aut dispensatoris - ut de his suggerat episcopo nec reprimat si quem positum in necessitate aliqua cognouerit aut deiectum opibus ad inopiae necessitatem redactum, maxime si non effusione adolescentiae sed direptione alicuius et amissione patrimonii in eam reciderit injuriam ut sumptum exercere diurnum non queat.
70. Summa etiam liberalitas, captos redimere, eripere ex hostium manibus, subtrahere neci homines, et maxime feminas turpitudini, redimere parentibus liberos, parentes liberis, ciues patriae restituere. Nota sunt haec nimis Illyrici uastitate et Thraciae: quanti ubique uenales erant toto captiui orbe! Quos si reuoces, unius prouinciae numerum explere non possint? Fuerunt tamen qui et quos Ecclesiae redemerunt, in seruitutem reuocare uellent, ipsa grauiores captiuitate qui inuiderent alienam misericordiam. Ipsi si in captiuitatem uenissent, seruirent liberi; si uenditi fuissent, seruitutis ministerium non recusarent. Et uolunt alienam libertatem rescindere qui suam seruitutem non possent rescindere, nisi forte pretium recipere emptori placeret, in quo tamen non rescinditur seruitus, sed redimitur.
71. Praecipua est igitur liberalitas redimere captiuos - et maxime ab hoste barbaro qui nihil deferat humanitatis ad misericordiam nisi quod auaritia reseruauerit ad redemptionem - aes alienum subire si debitor soluendo non sit atque artetur ad solutionem quae sit iure debita et inopia destituta, enutrire paruulos, pupillos tueri.
72. Sunt etiam qui uirgines orbatas parentibus tuendae pudicitiae gratia conubio locent, non solum studio sed etiam sumptu adiuuent. Est etiam illud genus liberalitatis, quod apostolus docet ut: Si quis fidelis habet uiduas, subministret illis ut earum alimoniis Ecclesia non grauetur ut his quae uere uiduae sunt, sufficiat.
 
Ambrose acknowledges that not everyone is able to alleviate poverty of others because their income may be sufficient for their family but insufficient for generosity. Those poorer persons should, nevertheless, help the poor by good works (c. 73–75).
 
76. Liquet igitur debere esse liberalitatis modum ne fiat inutilis largitas. Sobrietas tenenda est, maxime a sacerdotibus, ut non pro iactantia sed pro iustitia dispensent. Nusquam enim maior auiditas petitionis: ueniunt ualidi, ueniunt nullam causam nisi uagandi habentes, et uolunt subsidia euacuare pauperum, exinanire sumptum; nec exiguo contenti, maiora quaerunt, ambitu uestium captantes petitionis suffragium et natalium simulatione licitantes incrementa quaestuum. His si quis facile fidem deferat, cito exhaurit pauperum alimoniis futura compendia. Modus largiendi adsit ut nec illi inanes recedant neque transcribatur uita pauperum in spolia fraudulentorum. Ea ergo mensura sit ut neque humanitas deseratur nec destituatur necessitas.
77. Plerique simulant debita: sit ueri examen. Exutos se per latrocinia deplorant: aut iniuria fidem faciat aut cognitio personae quo propensius iuuetur. Ab Ecclesia relegatis sumptus impertiendus si desit eis alendi copia. Itaque qui modum seruat, auarus nulli sed largus omnibus est. Non enim solas aures praebere debemus audiendis precantum uocibus sed etiam oculos considerandis necessitatibus. Plus clamat bono operatori debilitas, quam uox pauperis. Neque uero fieri potest ut non extorqueat amplius importunitas uociferantum; sed non semper impudentiae locus sit. Videndus est ille qui te non uidet; requirendus est ille qui erubescit uideri. Ille etiam clausus in carcere occurrat tibi, ille adfectus aegritudine mentem tuam personet qui aures non potest.
78. Quo plus te operari uiderit populus, magis diliget. Scio plerosque sacerdotes qui plus contulerunt, plus abundasse, quoniam quicumque bonum operarium uidet, ipsi confert quod ille suo officio dispenset, securus quod ad pauperem sua perueniat misericordia: nemo enim uult nisi pauperi proficere suam collationem. Nam si quem aut immoderatum aut nimis tenacem dispensatorem uiderit, utrumque displicet: si aut superfluis erogationibus dissipet alieni fructus laboris aut recondat sacculis. Sicut igitur modus liberalitatis tenendus est, ita etiam calcar. Plerumque adhibendus uidetur modus ideo ut quod benefacis, id cottidie facere possis, ne subtrahas necessitati quod indulseris effusioni; calcar propterea quia melius operatur pecunia in pauperis cibo quam in diuitis sacculo. Caue ne intra loculos tuos includas salutem inopum et tamquam in tumulis sepelias uitam pauperum.
 
In what follows, Ambrose presents Joseph as a Scriptural example of the virtuous and prudent generosity (c. 80–86).
 
(ed. Testard 2000: 119-124; summary M. Szada)
Book 2
 
Ambrose points out that a person who despises riches inspires admiration among men. Then he continues:
 
67. Well then, the sober judgement that is indicated by a frugal lifestyle and the proper authority that is evidenced by self–control are seemly for people everywhere, and especially so for a person who occupies a position of honour. They prove that the man who is in the public eye is not held spellbound by his own treasures and that the man who has charge over free people is no slave to money himself. Rather, the seemly thing for someone in such a position is to be superior to treasure in his spirit while in his willingness to serve he is lower than a friend; for humility increases the esteem in which a person is held. Here is what is genuinely praiseworthy and appropriate in a man of the first rank: he must have no desire at all to pursue dishonourable gain, as do traders from Tyre or merchants from Gilead; he must not treat money as the source of every possible good; and he must not behave as though he were merely being paid to do a job, totting up his gains at the end of every day and calculating the profits he has made.
68. If it is praiseworthy to show that your spirit is unaffected by such desires, it is far more impressive still to win the affection of the masses by displaying a generosity which is neither prodigal towards those who are simply persistent in their requests nor miserly towards those who really are in need.
69. There are many kinds of generosity. It is not simply a matter of organizing and distributing food to those who lack the basic daily supplies to stay alive. There is also an obligation to give aid and assistance to those who are ashamed to show their needs openly—so long as the resources set aside for the needy as a whole are not exhausted in the process. I am speaking here of a responsibility which needs to be shouldered by someone who is in a responsible position, such as a priest or an almoner. Such a man should inform his bishop of people who fall into this category, and he should not hold back if he sees that a person is experiencing some need or other, or has by a reverse of fortune been reduced from a position of wealth to a state of hardship and poverty. This is especially important if the person has landed in this plight not as a result of youthful extravagance but because someone has stolen from him or because he has lost his inheritance, so that he is no longer in a position to meet his basic daily needs.
70. Another great act of generosity is to ransom prisoners, to snatch people from the hands of the enemy, to deliver men from death and—especially—women from dishonour, to hand children back to their parents and parents back to their children, and to restore citizens to their own country. We saw this all too clearly in the devastation of Illyricum and Thrace. How many prisoners were put up for sale, all over the world—if you could bring them all back, they would match the population of an entire province. And yet there were those who would have taken the very individuals whom the churches ransomed and brought them into slavery again. These people were more severe than the captivity itself: they begrudged mercy to others. If they had ended up in slavery themselves, would they be happy to behave like slaves, free men that they are? If they had been sold, would they not be refusing to serve as slaves? Yet they want to put an end to the freedom of others, when they are quite unable to put an end to their own slavery—unless of course a buyer would like to receive a payment; in which case slavery is not being brought to an end: rather, people are being ransomed from it.
71. It is a special act of generosity to ransom prisoners, then, particularly if they are in the hands of a barbarian enemy, who shows no regard for humanity and no interest in mercy, except in so far as his greed has kept an eye to the profit that might be made from the receipt of ransom–money. It is also a good thing to assume responsibility for a person's debts if he is not in a position to pay them himself, and to supply money which is legally owed but which a person has despaired of ever being able to pay on account of his poverty. It is great, too, to feed little children and to extend protection to orphans.
72. There are also people who endeavour to protect the honour of young women who have lost their parents, by arranging marriages for them, helping them not just with kind feelings but with practical support as well. There is another type of generosity that the apostle teaches, too, and it is this: "If a believer has widows in his family, he must take care of them himself, so that the church is not burdened by their upkeep, but has enough for those who truly are widows." [1 Tim 5:16]
 
Ambrose acknowledges that not everyone is able to alleviate poverty of others because their income may be sufficient for their family but insufficient for generosity. Those poorer persons should, nevertheless, help the poor by good works (c. 73–75).
 
76. It is clear, therefore, that we must observe due measure when we show generosity, so that we do not bestow the kind of largesse that is of no benefit to anyone. It is essential to maintain moderation, and doubly so for priests: they must distribute alms not for the sake of show but in the interests of justice. Nowhere are greed and begging a more serious problem than they are here. There are people who come along—people who are in perfectly good health—and they come along with no good reason other than the fact that they spend their lives wandering from place to place, and their intention is to use up the supplies intended for the poor, and to reduce to nothing the resources that have been collected for them. Nor are they content with just a little, but they keep on asking for more: they attempt to substantiate their claims by parading around in poor clothes, and they make a bid for greater rewards by pretending that they were born into high social surroundings. If anyone is naive enough to give credence to their claims, before he realizes it he drains the savings which were meant to provide food for the poor. There must be due measure in the generosity we show: that way, people will not go away with their pockets completely empty, but nor will the money collected for the basic subsistence of the poor be handed over to the fraudulent so that they can make off with it like plunder. We need to keep this sense of proportion: we must not forget a sense of humanity for people, but genuine hardship must not be left to fend for itself.
77. There are plenty of people who pretend to have debts. We need to look into the truth of their circumstances. They tell us tearfully that they have been stripped of everything by robbers: if their injury is obvious, or if you recognize who they are, this should make you trust them, and they should be given help all the more speedily. Those who have been removed from the church deserve to be given basic supplies, if they do not have the means to feed themselves. The person who maintains this kind of measure in his giving is miserly towards no one but generous towards all. It is not enough for us simply to offer a listening ear, to hear the voices of those who plead with us: we must also use our eyes, to look into their real needs. To the person whose mission it is to do good works, the weakness of a poor man cries out far more powerfully than his voice does. Of course, we cannot always ensure that people who are persistent and vociferous will not extort more, but let us not invariably give way to those who resort to effrontery. It is the person who does not see you that you must see; it is the person who is ashamed to be seen that you must seek out. You must give a thought, too, to the man who is shut up in prison, and the plight of the person who is laid low by illness ought to strike a chord in your heart, even if it cannot strike a chord in your ears.
78. The more the people see you doing good deeds, the more they will love you. I know of many priests who have found that the more they have given, the more plentiful their resources have been. The simple fact is, if anyone sees a man busily engaged in good deeds he is happy to give him something to distribute in his round of duty, for he is confident that his charity will reach the poor—after all, nobody wants his contribution to profit anyone other than the poor. Now if a person sees an almoner behaving in a fashion that is immoderate on the one hand or too sparing on the other, he is displeased either way: in the one case, the fruit of someone else's labour is being thrown away on excessive handouts; in the other, it is being hoarded in people's own pockets. So, just as it is essential when showing generosity to maintain a sense of due measure, it is equally necessary sometimes to be spurred into action. More often than not, it would appear, it is due measure that is called for, to ensure that you are able to perform your acts of kindness day after day and that you do not end up depriving someone in genuine need because you have chosen to indulge somebody else in a way that is extravagant. But there are also times when you need to be spurred into action, for money is put to better use when it feeds the poor than it is when it fills the pockets of the rich. Make sure that you are not drawing the string on the salvation of the needy when you draw the string on your purse, and that you are not burying the poor alive in there just as much as you would if you laid them in a tomb.
 
(trans. Davidson 2001: 303–313; summary M. Szada)

Discussion:

In c. 70, when Ambrose mentions the devastation of Illyricum and Thrace, he alludes most probably to the Gothic War in 378-382.

Place of event:

Region
  • Italy north of Rome with Corsica and Sardinia
City
  • Milan

About the source:

Author: Ambrose of Milan
Title: De officiis, On duties
Origin: Milan (Italy north of Rome with Corsica and Sardinia)
Denomination: Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian
Ambrose of Milan most probably wrote "De officiis" in the late 380s. With some probability, we can identify Ambrose`s allusion to "the times of Arian onslaught" to his confrontation with the Arians over the basilicas in Milan in 385-386 (see [1947] and [1951]). Similarly, the story about a certain urban prefect of Rome who failed to cope with the food shortage in the city may refer to Q. Aurelius Symmachus who was the prefect in 384. For the more detailed discussion on dating and references to the secondary literature see Davidson 2001: 3-5.
 
Ambrose to some extent modelled his work on the famous treatise by Cicero also titled De officiis. Ambrose follows Cicero in dividing his work into three books and he refers to Cicero`s considerations about what is virtuous, what is practical and about the opposition between the virtuous and practical. Ambrosian De officiis, however, is neither a Christian rendering of the classical pagan philosophical treatise nor the consistent refutation of Cicero, though he is evoked critically in several places. As Ivor Davidson proposed, De officiis is rather "designed to be a sign of Ambrose`s church`s relationship to the saeculum." (Davidson 2001: 59; see also McLynn 1994: 255-256). It is not devised to systematically respond to Cicero (and pagans in general) on philosophical grounds, and therefore much of the argument relies on the Scriptural exempla. These show that new Christian and clerical officialdom is superior to any former pagan elites because of its higher purposes and responsibility toward God. For this interpretation see Davidson 2001: 45-64.
 
The immediate addressees of the treatise are Ambrose`s clerics, especially the young ones as he frequently addresses them in a fatherly manner and makes allusions to their young age and lack of experience (e.g. I.65-66, 81, 87, 212, 217-218, II.97-101). It seems, however, also very probable that Ambrose`s had also in mind a wider readership of literary secular elites (Davidson 2001: 63-64).
 
Two primary families of the manuscript tradition name the treatise "De officiis". In the third, the longer version appears - "De officiis ministrorum". Although this is most possibly a corrective gloss, as Davidson notices (2001: 1), the longer title is more frequently used in modern scholarship. Ancient allusions to the treatise give the shorter version (Augustine, Letter 82.21; Cassiodorus, Institutiones 1.16.4).
Edition:
M. Testard ed., Ambroise de Milan, Les devoirs, 2 vols., Paris 1984-1992 (with French translation)
M. Testard ed., Ambrosii Mediolanensis De officiis, Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 15, Turnhout 2000
 
English translation with commentary:
I. Davidson ed., Ambrose, De officiis, 2 vols., Oxford 2001
Bibliography:
N. McLynn, Ambrose of Milan. Church and Court in Christian Capital, Oxford 1994

Categories:

Described by a title - Sacerdos/ἱερεύς
    Economic status and activity - Buying & selling
      Economic status and activity - Indication of wealth
        Economic status and activity - Gift
          Relation with - Bishop/Monastic superior
            Relation with - Children
              Relation with - Barbarian
                Relation with - Woman
                  Relation with - Socially marginal
                    Livelihood/income
                      Theoretical considerations - On priesthood
                        Devotion - Almsgiving
                          Devotion - Donations and offerings
                            Pastoral activity - Helping the poor and needy
                              Pastoral activity - Ransoming and visiting prisoners and captives
                                Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL: M. Szada, Presbyters in the Late Antique West, ER2032, http://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=2032