Presbyters Uniwersytet Warszawski
ID
ER 2012
Ambrose, bishop of Milan (Italy) in a philosophical treatise about duties "De officiis" explains why people who have remarried cannot be accepted to the clergy and that clerics should be chaste because purity is needed for the celebration of the sacraments. Milan, the late 380s.
Book 1
 
247. Advertimus quanta in nobis requirantur, ut abstinens sit a vino minister Domini, ut testimonio bono fulciatur non solum fidelium sed etiam ab his qui foris sunt. Decet enim actuum operumque nostrorum testem esse publicam existimationem, ne derogetur muneri, ut qui videt ministrum altaris congruis ornatum virtutibus, auctorem praedicet et Dominum veneretur qui tales servulos habeat. Laus enim Domini ubi munda possessio et innocens familiae disciplina.
248. De castimonia autem quid loquar, quando una tantum nec repetita permittitur copula? Et in ipso ergo coniugio lex est non iterare coniugium nec secundae coniugis sortiri coniunctionem. Quod plerisque mirum videtur cur etiam ante baptismum iterati coniugii ad electionem muneris et ordinationis praerogativam impedimenta generentur, cum etiam delicta obesse non soleant si lavacri remissa fuerint sacramento. Sed intellegere debemus quia baptismo culpa dimitti potest, lex aboleri non potest. In coniugio non culpa sed lex est: quod culpae est igitur in baptismate relaxatur, quod legis est in coniugio non solvitur. Quomodo autem potest hortator esse viduitatis qui ipse coniugia frequentaverit?
249. Inoffensum autem exhibendum et immaculatum ministerium nec ullo coniugali coitu violandum cognoscitis, qui integri corpore, incorrupto pudore, alieni etiam ab ipso consortio coniugali, sacri ministerii gratiam recepistis. Quod eo non praeterii, quia in plerisque abditioribus locis cum ministerium ingererent, vel etiam sacerdotium, filios susceperunt, et id tamquam usu veteri defendunt, quando per intervalla dierum sacrificium deferebatur. Et tamen castificabatur etiam populus per biduum aut triduum ut ad sacrificium purus accederet, ut in Veteri Testamento legimus: et lavat vestimenta sua. Si in figura tanta observantia, quanta in veritate! Disce, sacerdos atque Levita, quid sit lavare vestimenta tua, ut mundum corpus celebrandis exhibeas sacramentis. Si populus sine ablutione vestimentorum suorum prohibebatur accedere ad hostiam suam, tu illotus mente pariter et corpore audes pro aliis supplicare, audes aliis ministrare?
 
(ed. Testard 2000: 91)
Book 1
 
247. We can see how much is required of us. The minister of the Lord is to abstain from wine, and he is to be upheld by a good reputation, not just among the faithful but among those who are outside as well. It is seemly that public opinion should bear witness to our actions and our good works: this way, our office will not be disparaged, for the person who sees a minister of the alter adorned with virtues appropriate to his calling will bring praise to the Author of these virtues, and will worship the Lord who has such lowly servants. Praise redounds to the Lord when his possession is pure and the conduct of his household is blameless.
248. As for chastity—what is there to say? All that is permitted is one union and one union only, never to be repeated. So, if we take the actual question of marriage, the law is that you must not remarry or obtain a union with a second wife. A lot of people find this surprising: why should a second marriage, even one contracted before baptism, raise obstacles to a person's election to sacred office and to the privilege of ordination? After all, they reason, even serious crimes are not normally an impediment, once they have been remitted by the sacrament of baptism. But we need to understand this: just because sin can be forgiven through baptism, this does not mean that the law can be abolished. There is no sin in marriage, but there is a law. When we are talking about sin, we are dealing with something that can be relieved in baptism; when we are talking about the law in marriage, we are dealing with something that cannot be annulled. In any case, how can a man encourage other people to remain in a state of widowhood if he has gone through any number of marriages himself?
249. But you are quite aware that you have this obligation to present a ministry that is blameless and beyond reproach, and undefiled by any marital intercourse, for you have received the grace of the sacred ministry with your bodies pure, with your modesty intact, and with no experience at all of marital union. Still, I have had a reason for not passing over this point. In quite a number of out–of–the–way places, men who have been exercising a ministry—even, in some cases, the priesthood itself—have fathered children. They defend this behaviour by claiming that they are following an old custom, one which used to obtain when the sacrifice was offered only at lengthy intervals. Yet the fact is that even the ordinary people used to practise continence for a period of two or three days in order to approach the sacrifice in a state of purity, for we read in the Old Testament: "And he washes his clothes." [Exod 19:10] If the standard of observance was this scrupulous in the time of the figure, how much greater it should be now, in the time of the truth! Learn, priest and Levite, what it means to wash your clothes: it means displaying a body that is pure, properly prepared for the celebration of the sacraments. If the ordinary people were forbidden to approach their sacrificial victim without washing their clothes, have you the audacity to offer prayers on behalf of others, or have you the audacity to minister to others, with your spirit and body alike unwashed?
 
(trans. Davidson 2001: 259-263)

Place of event:

Region
  • Italy north of Rome with Corsica and Sardinia
City
  • Milan

About the source:

Author: Ambrose of Milan
Title: De officiis, On duties
Origin: Milan (Italy north of Rome with Corsica and Sardinia)
Denomination: Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian
Ambrose of Milan most probably wrote "De officiis" in the late 380s. With some probability, we can identify Ambrose`s allusion to "the times of Arian onslaught" to his confrontation with the Arians over the basilicas in Milan in 385-386 (see [1947] and [1951]). Similarly, the story about a certain urban prefect of Rome who failed to cope with the food shortage in the city may refer to Q. Aurelius Symmachus who was the prefect in 384. For the more detailed discussion on dating and references to the secondary literature see Davidson 2001: 3-5.
 
Ambrose to same extent modelled his work on the famous treatise by Cicero also titled De officiis. Ambrose follows Cicero in dividing his work into three books and he refers to Cicero`s considerations about what is virtuous, what is practical and about opposition between virtuous and practical. Ambrosian De officiis are not, however, a Christian rendering of the classical pagan philosophical treatise nor the consistent refutation of Cicero, though he is evoked critically in several places. As Ivor Davidson proposed, De officiis are rather "designed to be a sign of Ambrose`s church`s relationiship to the saeculum." (Davidson 2001: 59; see also McLynn 1994: 255-256). It is not devised to systematically respond to Cicero (and pagans in general) on philosophical grounds, and therefore much of the argument relies on the Scriptural exempla. These show that new Christian and clerical officialdom is superior to any former pagan elites because of its higher purposes and responsibility toward God. For this interpretation see Davidson 2001: 45-64.
 
The immediate addressees of the treatise are Ambrose`s clerics, especially the young ones as he frequently addresses them in fatherly manner and makes allusions to their young age and lack of experience (e.g. I.65-66, 81, 87, 212, 217-218, II.97-101). It seems, however, also very probable that Ambrose`s had also in mind wider readership of literary secular elites (Davidson 2001: 63-64).
 
Two primary families of the manuscript tradition name the treatise "De officiis". In the third, the longer version apears - "De officiis ministrorum". Although it is most possibly a corrective gloss, as Davidson notices (2001: 1), the longer title is more frequently used in modern scholarship. Ancient allusions to the treatise give the shorter version (Augustine, Letter 82.21; Cassiodorus, Institutiones 1.16.4).
Edition:
M. Testard ed., Ambroise de Milan, Les devoirs, 2 vols., Paris 1984-1992 (with French translation)
M. Testard ed., Ambrosii Mediolanensis De officiis, Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 15, Turnhout 2000
 
English translation with commentary:
I. Davidson ed., Ambrose, De officiis, 2 vols., Oxford 2001
Bibliography:
N. McLynn, Ambrose of Milan. Church and Court in Christian Capital, Oxford 1994

Categories:

Family life - Marriage
    Family life - Offspring
      Family life - Widowerhood
        Sexual life - Sexual activity
          Sexual life - Sexual abstinence
            Sexual life - Virginity
              Food/Clothes/Housing - Food and drink
                Described by a title - Sacerdos/ἱερεύς
                  Impediments or requisits for the office - Improper/Immoral behaviour
                    Impediments or requisits for the office - Marriage
                      Ritual activity - Eucharist
                        Relation with - Wife
                          Relation with - Woman
                            Sexual life - Marital
                              Described by a title - Minister/λειτουργός/ὑπηρέτης
                                Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL: M. Szada, Presbyters in the Late Antique West, ER2012, http://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=2012