Letter 38
Gelasius to Philip and Cassiodorus.
The case of Caelestinus is such that I do not reckon you do not know about it too. If indeed he has been found guilty of being accessory to the murder of his relative and bishop, as far as is shown by the contents of the proceedings, by the judgement of all he is in no way considered worthy of his office of the altar, and communion is forbidden to him for one year because of such a hateful crime, insofar as, by performing appropriate penance, he attends to the steep descent pertaining to a crime of such magnitude. But even if he were not ordered in the least to do so by us, with greater consideration for the sacrament of the divine body he should have come back to it with greater consideration for the sacrament of the divine body he should have come back to it with a mind that has been cleansed. We now think, however, that the period of penance is either complete or almost concluded. After that, there is no doubt that the faculty of communion lies open to him, so that both the verdict of the synod can be left off and it be of more benefit to him, let him be able to be made clean by making greater amends.
(trans. Neil – Allen 2014: 189-190, slightly altered)