It is commonly held in the historiography that the presbytera Leta was the wife of the presbyter, and not an office-holder herself (see e.g. the note of Leta in PCBE 2, Italie, v. 2, where it is even suggested that she might have been the wife of the presbyter Monses known from the other inscription from Tropea see [1301]). That she should be rather interpreted as a proper presbyter was argued by Otranto 1982 and Eisen 2000.