Presbyters Uniwersytet Warszawski
ID
ER 1104
Cyprian, bishop of Carthage (North Africa), writes along with other African bishops to Stephen I, bishop of Rome, that the presbyters and deacons who went across to heretics must not be received back in their dignities. Cyprian, Letter 72, AD 256.
Epistula 72
 
II,1. Addimus plane et adiungimus, frater carissime, consensu et auctoritate communi, ut etiam si qui presbyteri aut diaconi uel in ecclesia catholica prius ordinati fuerint et postmodum perfidi ac rebelles contra ecclesiam steterint uel apud haereticos a pseudoepiscopis et antichristis contra Christi dispositionem profana ordinatione promoti sint et contra altare unum atque diuinum sacrificia foris falsa ac sacrilega offerre conati sint, eos quoque hac condicione suscipi cum reuertuntur ut communicent laici et satis habeant quod admittuntur ad pacem qui hostes pacis extiterint, nec debere eos reuertentes ea apud nos ordinationis et honoris arma retinere quibus contra nos rebellauerint.
2. Oportet enim sacerdotes et ministros qui altari et sacrificiis deseruiunt integros atque inmaculatos esse, cum Dominus Deus in Leuitico loquatur et dicat: “homo in quo fuerit macula et uitium non accedet offerre dona Deo”, item, in Exodo haec eadem praecipiat et dicat: “et sacerdotes qui accedunt ad dominum deum sanctificentur, ne forte derelinquat illos dominus”, et iterum: “et cum accedunt ministrare ad altare sancti, non adducent in se delictum ne moriantur”. Quod autem maius potest esse delictum aut quae macula deformior quam aduersus Christum stetisse, quam ecclesiam eius quam ille sanguine suo parauit et condidit dissipasse, quam euangelicae pacis ac dilectionis oblitum contra unanimem et concordem dei populum hostilis discordiae furore pugnasse?
3. Qui etsi ipsi postmodum ad ecclesiam redeunt, restituere tamen eos et se cum reuocare non possunt qui ab eis seducti et foris morte praeuenti extra ecclesiam sine communicatione et pace perierunt, quorum animae in die iudicii de ipsorum manibus expetentur qui perditionis auctores et duces extiterunt. Et idcirco satis est talibus reuertentibus ueniam dari, non tamen debet in domo fidei perfidia promoueri. Nam quid bonis et innocentibus atque ab ecclesia non recedentibus reseruamus, si eos qui a nobis recesserint et contra ecclesiam steterint honoramus?
 
(ed. Diercks 1996: 525-527)
 
 
Letter 72
 
II,1. We add, however, and connect with what we have said, dearest brother, with common consent and authority, that if, again, any presbyters or deacons, who either have been before ordained in the Catholic Church, and have subsequently stood forth as traitors and rebels against the Church, or who have been promoted among the heretics by a profane ordination by the hands of false bishops and antichrists contrary to the appointment of Christ, and have attempted to offer, in opposition to the one and divine altar, false and sacrilegious sacrifices, that these also be received when they return, on this condition, that they communicate as laymen, and hold it to be enough that they should be received to peace, after having stood forth as enemies of peace; and that they ought not, on returning, to retain those arms of ordination and honour with which they rebelled against us.
2. For it behoves priests and ministers, who wait upon the altar and sacrifices, to be sound and stainless; since the Lord God speaks in Leviticus, and says, “No man that hath a stain or a blemish shall come nigh to offer gifts to the Lord” (Lev 21:21). Moreover, in Exodus, He prescribes this same thing, and says, “And let the priests which come near to the Lord God sanctify themselves, lest the Lord forsake them” (Exod 19:22).  And again: “And when they come near to minister at the altar of the holy place, they shall not bear iniquity upon them, lest they die" (Exod 28:43 LXX). But what can be greater iniquity, or what stain can be more odious, than to have stood in opposition to Christ; than to have scattered His Church, which He purchased and founded with His blood; than, unmindful of evangelical peace and love, to have fought with the madness of hostile discord against the unanimous and accordant people of God?
3. Such as these, although they themselves return to the Church, still cannot restore and recall with them those who, seduced by them, and forestalled by death without, have perished outside the Church without communion and peace; whose souls in the day of judgment shall be required at the hands of those who have stood forth as the authors and leaders of their ruin. And therefore to such, when they return, it is sufficient that pardon should be granted; since perfidy ought certainly not to receive promotion in the household of faith. For what do we reserve for the good and innocent, and those who do not depart from the Church, if we honour those who have departed from us, and stood in opposition to the Church?
 
(trans. R.E. Wallis, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iv.iv.lxxi.html, slightly altered)
 
 

Discussion:

In the 250s, numerous clerics rebelled against the authority of the bishops in Carthage and Rome, mainly on the grounds of the treatment of the lapsi, considering it either too lenient (the Novatianists), or too harsh. "As far as the bishop of Carthage was concerned, someone who was ordained validly but joined a breakaway community in heresy and schism was a cleric no longer" (Dunn 2006: 266), and he could be received back only as a layman, despite the Roman practice being probably more lenient (and this is the cause of writing this letter).
 
 

Place of event:

Region
  • Latin North Africa

About the source:

Author: Cyprian
Title: Letters, Epistulae, Epistolae
Origin: Carthage (Latin North Africa)
Denomination: Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian
Cyprian was born probably about 200 AD. He converted to Christianity in about 245 and in 248 was elected Bishop of Carthage. Soon after, the Decian persecution began (in 249/250) and Cyprian went into hiding. In 251 he returned to the city. Under Valerian, he was exiled in 257 and executed in 258. The epistolary of Cyprian consists of 81 letters (16 of them by his correspondents, and 6 synodal or collective), the majority of them are from the period of 250-251, when they were the means of Cyprian`s communication with his clergy. They offer us a wide view on the organization of the Church in Carthage in the middle of the third century, her relation with the Church of Rome, on the development of the persecutions, and on the conflicts that they caused inside the Church.
Different numerations of Cyprian's letters exist, I follow the edition of Diercks in Corpus Christianorum.
Edition:
G.F. Diercks ed., Sancti Cypriani Episcopi Epistularium. Epistulae 58-81, Corpus Christianorum. Series Latina 3C, Turnhout 1996.
Bibliography:
G.D. Dunn, "Validity of baptism and ordination in the African response to the «rebaptism» crisis: Cyprian of Carthage's synod of spring 256”, Theological Studies 67 (2006), 257-274.

Categories:

Religious grouping (other than Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian) - Novatianist
    Change of denomination
      Described by a title - Presbyter/πρεσβύτερος
        Described by a title - Sacerdos/ἱερεύς
          Impediments or requisits for the office - Heresy/Schism
            Ritual activity - Eucharist
              Public law - Ecclesiastical
                Relation with - Heretic/Schismatic
                  Further ecclesiastical career - Lay status
                    Described by a title - Minister/λειτουργός/ὑπηρέτης
                      Administration of justice - Demotion
                        Theoretical considerations - On priesthood
                          Religious grouping (other than Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian) - Unspecified 'heretic'
                            Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL: S. Adamiak, Presbyters in the Late Antique West, ER1104, http://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=1104