From the summary of the cases on which the synodal father decided:
Canon 2
After the solemn pronouncement of the holy faith, an obvious error was brought to our attention which has to be destroyed with such great application of discipline as great was perversity that admitted it in the first place. Some persons are said to offer at the Lord's sacrifices milk or grapes instead of wine and some also think that for full communion the Eucharist distributed to people should be dipped in wine. Also, what is worse, some priests use the vessels of the Lord at their banquets and dare to eat from them. [...]
Canon 2
On sacred vessels: a vessel dedicated to the Lord shall not be turned to mundane use.
A great care and all diligence must be taken lest those who obtained a governing position cause damage to heavenly sacraments. For we were told, and it is considered horrible even to hear and execrable to see, that some priests, inclined to this by sacrilegious temerity, turned the vessels of the Lord into their private use on banquets and eat from them. We have no words for this evil and we wept, speechless, that human temerity prepared a meal in a vessel at which, as they know, the Holy Spirit is invoked and that a drunkard take a fleshy food from the vessel in which he celebrated the divine mysteries. In those vessels in which he performed such a great mystery for the expiation of sins, he also satisfied the desire of his lust.
Therefore, the person who dared to do such a thing that knowing that the vessels are for the divine ministry turned them into their private use or eat or drink from them, should lose their rank and office. If this person is lay, he or she should be punished with perpetual excommunication. If this person is from the religious order, he should be demoted. All those who knowingly turned into their private use, sold or gave away the ecclesiastical ornaments, cloths or any other vestments and utensils, should be considered guilty and liable to the punishment of condemnation.
(trans. M. Szada)
