Presbyters Uniwersytet Warszawski
ID
ER 1042
Canon 1 of the Third Council of Braga (Iberian Peninsula, AD 675) orders the use of only bread and wine for the Eucharistic offering, and forbids their substitution with milk and grapes.
Canon 1
 
Ut repulsis omnibus opinionibus supprestitionum, panis tantum et vinum aqua permista in sacrificium offeratur.
 
Quum omne crimen atque peccatum oblatis Deo sacrificiis deleatur, quid de cetero pro delictorum expiatione Domino dabitur quando in ipsa sacrificii oblatione erratur? Audivimus enim quosdam schismatica ambitione detentos contra divinos ordines et apostolicas institutiones lac pro vino in divinis sacrificiis dedicare, alios quoque intinctam eucharistiam populis pro complemento communionis porrigere, quosdam etiam non expressum vinum in sacramento dominici calicis offerre sed oblatis uvis populis communicare. Quod quam sit evangelicae atque apostolicae doctrinae contrarium et consuetudini ecclesiasticae adversum non difficile ab ipso fonte veritatis provabitur a quo ordinata ipsa sacramentorum materia processerunt. Quum enim magister veritatis verum salutis nostrae sacrifitium suis commendaret discipulis, non illum lac, sed panem tantum et calicem sub hoc sacramento benedixisse cognoscimus. Ait enim evangelica veritas. Accepit Iesus panem et calicem et benedicens dedit discipulis suis.
Cesset ergo lac in sacrificio offerri, quia manifestum et evidens exemplum evangelicae veritatis influxit, quod praeter panem et vinum aliud offerri non sinit.
Illud vero quod pro complemento communionis intinctam tradunt eucharistiam populis nec hoc prolatum ex evangelio testimonium recipit, ubi apostolis corpus suum et sanguinem commendavit; seorsum enim panis et seorsum calicis commendatio memoratur. Nam intinctum panem aliis Christum prebuisse non legimus, excepto illi tantum discipulo quem intincta bucella magistri proditorem ostenderet non quae sacramenti huius institutionem signaret. Nam quod de inexpresso botro, id est de uvarum granis populus communicatur, valde est omnino confusum; calix enim dominicus iuxta quod quidam doctor edisserit, vino et aqua permixtus debet offerri; quia videmus in aqua populum intellegi, in vino vero ostendi sanguinem Christi.
 
The canon explains theologically why wine must be mixed with water.
 
Et ideo nulli deinceps licitum erit aliud in sacrificiis divinis offerre nisi iuxta antiquorum sententias conciliorum panem tantum et calicem vino et aqua permixtum. De cetero aliter quam praeceptum est faciens tandiu a sacrificando cessabit quamdiu legitima paenitentiae satisfactione correptus ad gradus sui officium redeat quem amisit.
 
(ed. Vives 1963: 372-374)
Canon 1
 
That all the superstitious opinions are to be repulsed and only bread and wine mixed with water be offered as a sacrifice.
 
Since every crime and sin is deleted by sacrifices offered to God, what else will be given to the Lord in return for expiation of sins when there is an error in the offering of the sacrifice? We have heard that some people, driven by schismatic ambition against the divine orders and apostolic institutions, offer milk in divine sacrifices instead of wine, and others distribute to the people the Eucharist dipped [in the wine] for completion of the communion, and that some others also did not offer in the mystery of the chalice of the Lord the pressed wine, but gave the communion to the people in the form of grapes. It is not difficult to demonstrate from the fount of truth from which the ordered matter of the sacraments proceeds that those practices are contrary to the evangelic and apostolic doctrine and opposite to ecclesiastical custom. For when the teacher of the truth commanded that his disciples make a true offering of our salvation, he blessed in this sacrament, as we know, not the milk but only bread and wine. The evangelic truth has thus proclaimed it. Jesus took bread and a chalice, blessed them and gave to his disciples. Let milk be no longer offered in sacrifices, because from the evangelic example of the truth it clearly and evidently follows that nothing else can be offered except bread and wine. Also the fact that the Eucharist dipped in wine is distributed to the people for completion of the communion does not find its source in the passage from the Gospel in which the Lord gives his disciples his body and blood, because it mentions that the giving of bread was separate from the giving of the chalice. We do not read that Christ offered to the others dipped bread to others, except the disciple to whom He passed a dipped morsel of bread so as to indicate that he was a traitor - this was not meant to sanction the institution of the sacrament. As for the unpressed grapes, when the people communicate with grape berries, this is indeed a great confusion. For the chalice of the Lord, according to the doctrine of a certain teacher [=Cyprian of Carthage, Letter 62], has to be offered as a mixture of wine and water, because the water signifies the people, and the wine the blood of Christ.
 
The canon explains theologically why wine must be mixed with water.
 
And therefore, from now on offering anything but bread and a chalice of wine mixed with water in the divine sacraments, according to the ancient decrees of the councils, is not allowed. If someone does it differently than is precepted, he shall abstain from offering until he has been punished by the proper penance and regains the grade of his office which he lost.
 
(trans. M. Szada)

Discussion:

The canon justifies the mixing of wine and water for the Eucharistic offering by the reference to Letter 62 of Cyprian of Carthage to Caecilius ("On the Sacrament of the Cup of the Lord").

Place of event:

Region
  • Iberian Peninsula
City
  • Braga

About the source:

Title: Third Council of Braga in 675 AD, 3rd Council of Braga, III Concilium Bracarense a. 675, Concilium III Bracarense, Concilium Bracarense tertium a. 675
Origin: Braga (Iberian Peninsula)
Denomination: Catholic/Nicene/Chalcedonian
The provincial council of Galicia in AD 675 was convoked by King Wamba (672–80) and was presided over by Bishop Leudigisius of Braga (Iberian Peninsula). It was attended by seven other bishops.
Edition:
J. Vives ed., Concilios visigóticos e hispano-romanos, Barcelona-Madrid 1963.

Categories:

Described by a title - Sacerdos/ἱερεύς
    Ritual activity - Eucharist
      Ritual activity - Temporal impediment to presbyterial activity
        Public law - Ecclesiastical
          Administration of justice - Ecclesiastical
            Administration of justice - Demotion
              Administration of justice - Penance
                Please quote this record referring to its author, database name, number, and, if possible, stable URL: M. Szada, Presbyters in the Late Antique West, ER1042, http://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=1042